<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I call bullshit on the OED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/</link>
	<description>keepin&#039; the world über safe since 1977</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m not disputing when the term was incorrectly defined and popularized by the NYTimes. The Engadget article that I link to is all about correcting that. The OED piece on the other hand is like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_streets&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;trap street&lt;/a&gt; left by the NYTimes. You&#039;ll notice that they cunningly don&#039;t attribute the source of the definition, although the NYT and Engaddget pieces were written nearl four months earlier on the 2 of March. 

My beef is with the OED for not bothering to check their facts independently, and not attributing correctly, rather than the incorrect example that was used to popularize the term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m not disputing when the term was incorrectly defined and popularized by the NYTimes. The Engadget article that I link to is all about correcting that. The OED piece on the other hand is like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_streets" rel="nofollow">trap street</a> left by the NYTimes. You&#8217;ll notice that they cunningly don&#8217;t attribute the source of the definition, although the NYT and Engaddget pieces were written nearl four months earlier on the 2 of March. </p>
<p>My beef is with the OED for not bothering to check their facts independently, and not attributing correctly, rather than the incorrect example that was used to popularize the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zephoria</title>
		<link>http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>zephoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 06:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uberthings.com/2006/06/06/i-call-bullshit-on-the-oed/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Well, actually, you&#039;re not entirely correct.  The NYTimes introduced (and &quot;popularized&quot;) the term bluensarfing in relation to Paris.  The NYTimes coverage was wrong on technical grounds, but it was the source of the popularization and it was in relation to Paris even though her Sidekick wasn&#039;t bluesnarfed.  So it&#039;s a question of when a term is popularized regardless of the accuracy of the event that sparked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually, you&#8217;re not entirely correct.  The NYTimes introduced (and &#8220;popularized&#8221;) the term bluensarfing in relation to Paris.  The NYTimes coverage was wrong on technical grounds, but it was the source of the popularization and it was in relation to Paris even though her Sidekick wasn&#8217;t bluesnarfed.  So it&#8217;s a question of when a term is popularized regardless of the accuracy of the event that sparked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
